September 1974
Volume 1, Number 1
What then is elitist art? If, by this, we mean art produced by members of an elite, then we can only note that, in recent times, most of the painters and sculptors whose names we know came from some part of the middle classes, a very few from the working class, and hardly any from the aristocracy. If we look to more remote times we shall find that painters were usually members of a guild, which, in a sense, was an elitist organisation, and, going back still further, we find in primitive societies work of art sometimes produced by priests, sometimes by women, sometimes by specialised artificers, and sometimes by the whole community. But very often, in the great body of anonymous art, we do not know what the social position of the artist may have been. There is insufficient evidence to allow us to make generalisations. Art that is produced by members of an elite is not distinguishable from art that is made by the masses, so that the term can hardly be used to any purpose.
Quentin Bell is professor of the history and theory of art, Sussex University. He has writtenVirginia Woolf: A Biography, Of Human Finery, Ruskin, Victorian Artists and Bloomsbury. Other contributions to Critical Inquiry are "The Art Critic and the Art Historian" (Spring 1975), "CRITICAL RESPONSE: Notes and Exchanges" (Summer 1979), and "Bloomsbury and 'the Vulgar Passions'" (Winter 1979).