PERSPECTIVES ON WALTER BENJAMIN

Critical Inquiry

Winter 1999
Volume 25, Number 2

Excerpt from
Benjamin and Wittgenstein: Signals and Affinities
by Stanley Cavell

The invitation to participate in a small conference on Walter Benjamin at Yale's humanities center meant to assess the appearance of the first volume of Harvard's Selected Writings of Benjamin as a measure from which, as the letter of invitation frames things, nonspecialists in Benjamin studies are asked to "evaluate Benjamin's contribution to their respective fields," was irresistible, allowing one to speak from, without quite parading, an ignorance it is otherwise hard to overcome. Whatever the exact perimeter and surface of my field, let us say, of philosophy, judged by the work from which I have made a living for most of a lifetime, it is, and, while partially and restlessly, has wanted to be, territory shared with those who, however different otherwise, acknowledge some affinity with the later Wittgenstein and with J. L. Austin, if just so far as those thinkers are recognizable as inheritors, hence no doubt betrayers, of a tradition of philosophy that definitively includes Frege, Russell, Carnap, and Quine. Seen from that shared territory, an honest answer to the question of Benjamin's actual contribution to the field is that it is roughly nil. But if that were my sole space for an answer, I would not have accepted the prompting to respond to the question.

Two helpful anthologies of writing about Benjamin--one from two or three years ago edited by Andrew Benjamin and Peter Osborne and one from ten years earlier edited by Gary Smith--are explicit in their wish to present Benjamin in his aspect, or should one say semblance, as a philosopher; both are explicit in wishing to counter the dominating semblance of Benjamin as a great critic, as lent to him in the English-speaking world by Hannah Arendt's portrait and collection under the title Illuminations, as they are explicit in recognizing that Benjamin at best created, and aspired to, as Adorno put the matter, "a philosophy directed against philosophy," which they are also prepared to recognize as something that a creative canonical modern philosopher, since I suppose Descartes and Bacon, is rather bound to do.1 This gesture of a disciplinary or counterdisciplinary appropriation of Benjamin focuses two points of interest for me (I do not suppose them incompatible with those editors' intentions): (1) Benjamin's anti- or counterphilosophy may be seen specifically as immeasurably distant from and close to Wittgenstein's anti- or counterphilosophy in Philosophical Investigations; (2) there is an economy of inspiration and opacity in Benjamin's prose--sometimes it is, as Emerson puts things, a play of intuition and tuition--that suggests a reason that the idea of philosophy should not simply replace or succeed that of criticism in coming to terms with his achievement. Benjamin enacts, more or less blatantly, a contesting of the philosophical with the literary, or of what remains of each, that seems internal at once to the exceptional prestige of his work and to an effect of intimacy or concern it elicits from its readers.

A sense of affinity between Benjamin and Wittgenstein helped produce the signals in my subtitle, when, with the memory in my head of Benjamin's frequently cited letter to Scholem (17 April 1931) in which he expresses a phantasm of his writing as a call or signal for rescue from the top of the crumbling mast of a sinking ship,2 I came upon a piece of his with the title "Program for a Proletarian Children's Theater" containing these sentences: "Almost every child's gesture is command and signal," and "it is the task of the director to rescue the children's signals out of the dangerous magic realm of mere fantasy and to bring them to bear on the material."3 One hardly knows whether Benjamin is there identifying more with the director than with the child, whose world Benjamin of course enters elsewhere as well (apart from his interest in the history of children's books, I cite Jeffrey Mehlman's fascinating Walter Benjamin for Children: An Essay on His Radio Years).4 And I know of no other major philosophical sensibility of this century who attaches comparable importance to the figure of the child with the exception of Wittgenstein in the Investigations, which opens with Augustine's portrait of himself as a child stealing language from his elders, an autobiographical image that haunts every move in Wittgenstein's drive to wrest language back from what he calls metaphysics, and what we might perhaps still call the absolute.5

To the extent that opening a path for Benjamin's contribution to my field will be furthered by opening certain passages between his writing and Wittgenstein's Investigations--which is the object of these remarks--I have to give an idea of how I have wished to see the Investigations received.

1. See Walter Benjamin's Philosophy: Destruction and Experience, ed. Andrew Benjamin and Peter Osborne (London, 1994); Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History, ed. Gary Smith (Chicago, 1989); and Walter Benjamin, Illuminations, trans. Harry Zohn, ed. Hannah Arendt (New York, 1969).

2. See Benjamin, letter to Gershom Scholem, 17 Apr. 1931, The Correspondence of Walter Benjamin, 1892-1940, trans. Manfred R. Jacobson and Evelyn M. Jacobson, ed. Scholem and Theodor W. Adorno (Chicago, 1994), p. 378.

3. Benjamin, "Program for a Proletarian Children's Theater," in The Weimar Republic Sourcebook, trans. Don Reneau et al., ed. Anton Kaes, Martin Jay, and Edward Dimendberg (Berkeley, 1994), p. 233.

4. See Jeffrey Mehlman, Walter Benjamin for Children: An Essay on His Radio Years (Chicago, 1993).

5. See Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 3d ed., trans. G. E. M. Anscomb (London, 1958), for example, §47; hereafter abbreviated PI.

Stanley Cavell is the Walter M. Cabot Professor of Aesthetics and the General Theory of Value (emeritus) at Harvard University. He is the author, most recently, of Contesting Tears: The Hollywood Melodrama of the Unknown Woman (1996), Philosophical Passages : Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida (1995), and A Pitch of Philosophy: Autobiographical Exercises (1994).

Editorial Office main page * Back Issues * Subscribe to CI