Romantic Archives: Literature and the Politics of
Identity in Bengal
by Dipesh Chakrabarty
The long Bengali
nineteenth century is perhaps finally dying. It may therefore make
sense to treat its death as a proper object of historical study. In the
context of the remarks made by my friend whose sentiments made me think
of the subject of this essay, I want to ask: What was the nature of the
bhadralok investment in literature and language that
once made these into the means of feeling one's Bengaliness? Here it is
useful to pay some attention to the works of Dinesh Chandra Sen, the
pioneering historian and a lifelong devotee of Bengali literature.4
Once hailed as the foremost historian of Bengali literature, he was
lampooned by a younger generation of intellectuals in the 1930s who
faulted his sense of both politics and history. It is the story of the
early reception and the later rejection of Sen's work that I want to
use here as a way to think about the questions raised by my friend.
A few biographical details are in order. Born in a
village in the district of Dhaka in 1866, Dinesh Chandra Sen (or Dinesh
Sen for short) graduated from the University of Calcutta with honors in
English literature in 1889 and was appointed the headmaster of Comilla
Victoria School in 1891 in Comilla in Bangladesh. While working there,
he started scouring parts of the countryside in Eastern Bengal in
search of old Bengali manuscripts. The research and publications
resulting from his efforts led to his connections with Ashutosh
Mukherjee, the famed educator of Bengal and twice the vice chancellor
of the University of Calcutta (1906–1914 and 1921–23). In 1909,
Mukherjee appointed Sen to a readership and subsequently to a research
fellowship in Bengali at the university.
|