By Susie Allen | Photos by Eddie Quinones
Fifty years ago University of Chicago students camped out overnight in Ida Noyes Hall for the chance to take home works by artists including Paul Klee, Wassily Kandinsky and René Magritte. The prints and paintings were theirs to display in their rooms and enjoy for the rest of the quarter.
This fall a new generation of students showed equal commitment when the Art to Live With program returned after a three-decade hiatus. By 8 a.m. on the day of Art Match, the courtyard outside the Smart Museum of Art was filled with about 100 students, some of whom had arrived as early as 11 p.m., and strewn with backpacks, sleeping bags, blankets and a touch of Warhol whimsy in the form of a giant stuffed Winnie the Pooh.
The program was founded in 1958 by Dean of Students Harold Haydon, LAB’26, PhB’30, AM’31, and Joseph R. Shapiro, EX’34, an art collector and a cofounder of the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago. Shapiro believed “the best way to become acquainted with art—and to appreciate it—is to live with it.” So he tried to give students the experience he had every day as a collector. By 1962 the number of works available for students to borrow had grown from 50 to 500. (Although the pieces were originally on loan, Shapiro later donated them to the University.) The collection included several works by contemporary Chicago artists that Shapiro hoped would appeal to students’ tastes.
Although the program enjoyed huge popularity in the 1960s and ’70s, Art to Live With was discontinued in the late 1980s. (Some of the original pieces now hang in public spaces around campus; others will be available to borrow in years to come.) The program’s return was made possible by a gift from University Trustee Gregory Wendt, AB’83, who participated as a student, borrowing a print by the Latvian-American artist Sven Lukin. The program is now open to College students living in the University of Chicago’s seven residence halls.
This year prints by Pablo Picasso and Joan Miró were especially coveted, said first-year Michael Burke, who arrived at the Smart Museum about 1:45 a.m. and by sun-up was “running on the free coffee that they gave us.” Burke had his eyes on the abstract, brightly colored works of the 20th-century American painter Alfred Jensen. “I don’t think the Picasso is that cute, actually,” he said. “I more want something that I want to look at every day.” But he’d be happy with anything. (In the end he left with Alfred Leslie’s Four Women, which, with its 1960s look, “is totally giving me Dreamgirls vibes.”)
Behind Burke in line, fellow first-year Will Asness was hoping for a Miró, though he’s realistic about his chances of getting one (slim) and cheerful despite how long he’s been awake (nearly 24 hours). It hasn’t been the night he planned: “I was walking back to my dorm to get a nice, nice sleep” when a friend told him everyone was camping out to get art. It sounded like a fun way to spend the night, and besides, he’s got a “section of free wall just calling for” something to fill it.
In groups of six or seven, students are let into the museum to pick from the 75 pieces on offer. Once they’ve made a selection, they fill out some paperwork and wait for their art to be bubble-wrapped for safe transportation to its new exhibition space. Today the program is entirely free, but in its first iteration, students paid a fee of 50 cents to a dollar to secure the loan.
Finding new homes with students
Despite what you might imagine, museum staff aren’t too concerned about the safety of the objects back in the residence halls. It’s a bit like taking home the class hamster, explained Alison Gass, the Dana Feitler Director of the Smart Museum. “I’ve talked with other museum directors, because there are strong programs like this across the country … and what everybody tells me is that it’s actually quite amazing how respectful and responsible students are toward these art objects. Very rarely does real damage happen to them.” (The museums are also careful about which pieces they lend. The Picassos and Mirós in the Art to Live With collection are prints—still valuable, and touched by the artists’ hands—and no one, Gass said with a laugh, is getting the museum’s beloved Rothko.)
First-year Alex LaHood said he’s feeling the pressure: The thought of living with a piece of art history is “slightly stressful but also cool.” His housemate Ethan Truelove was equally incredulous that the Francisco de Goya print he selected will be sitting next to “a six-dollar nylon flag and some baseball caps I have on my wall, and the little University of Chicago felt flag that everyone else has.”
As the line progresses, fewer and fewer students end up with their first choices, but most take the setback in stride. First-year Julia Matyjas picked a tropical landscape print by Georges Rouault that complements her room’s travel-themed décor; her roommate wound up with Francis Chapin’s sketch of a figure sitting on a stool, which she deems “the most normal one left.” Third-year Ben Warren selects a piece he and his friends have dubbed “the Creepy Baby” (actual title: Baby with Blue Scarf by Eleanor Coen). “This guy liked it,” he explained, gesturing to his roommate. “I can vibe with it,” the roommate agreed.
Gass said that students will soon play a bigger role in selecting the pieces included in Art to Live With. The Smart plans to put together a student collections committee, similar to the museum board’s collections committee. With the students’ help, Gass hopes they can diversify the works available to borrow, “so that we have artists from every background represented.”
And with more pieces in the collection, more students will have the opportunity to live with art. Outside the Smart Museum, a late arrival sounds wistful as she admires her friend’s choice. “I’ll go to your room all the time and stand there and bask.”
—This story first appeared in The University of Chicago Magazine.
Originally published on February 19, 2018.